Search | View Active Threads | View New Posts
Current Time: 08:59 AM

 

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 5
FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 74
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Wales (UK)
    Posts
    24,745
    How about :

    BLOG.NAME

    is it worth alot?
    no.
    When using google for counts - use double quotes for usage counts for multiword terms and set "match type" to "exact" for all search volume lookups. Click here for more info

  2. #32
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    1,057
    oh cool now I know it is worth more than I thought...


    And how about:
    Women.name

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Wales (UK)
    Posts
    24,745
    you can't just ignore the meaning "name" has and register any old term in it as you would neutral tld's imo.

    women.name makes no sense as a complete term.
    When using google for counts - use double quotes for usage counts for multiword terms and set "match type" to "exact" for all search volume lookups. Click here for more info

  4. #34
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    1,057
    There is no sense in this biz,,,as you know.
    For example kod.com gettink 36k bids in Pool.


  5. #35
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Wales (UK)
    Posts
    24,745
    It boils down to what people want, what they will pay for it and/or what it earns. It really is as simple as that.
    When using google for counts - use double quotes for usage counts for multiword terms and set "match type" to "exact" for all search volume lookups. Click here for more info

  6. #36
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    1,057
    As I said...no sense.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Manila
    Posts
    6
    I regged Escrow.name . I think it fits the extension quite well, from a domainer's point-of-view.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    .in
    Posts
    701
    armstrong. Good name. will have to compete with escrow.com guy.may be you may start a cheaper escrow service for domains!
    Digital Intoxication-Live,Learn and Earn Online - Technology, Entrepreneurship and More.
    http://HI.FI.VC

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    .US
    Posts
    1,563
    I don't know, just for kicks. I bought

    Retarded.name

    and

    amw.name (America's Most Wanted)

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Manila
    Posts
    6
    Originally posted by catchnames
    armstrong. Good name. will have to compete with escrow.com guy.may be you may start a cheaper escrow service for domains!
    Thanks, catchnames. Yes, development is definitely moving in that direction.

  11. #41
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    12
    Picked up:

    parked.name
    moniker.name
    rfid.name
    gear.name

    I like 'em.

  12. #42
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    28
    i see all these names and tbh most of em are just a waste of money imo, unless developed why would an individual or company want to buy blog.name or numerous others people have posted in this thread, none of the relate to the actual extension besides a few like women.name etc...

  13. #43
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    .in
    Posts
    701
    Originally posted by safesys
    no.
    Don't worry about what safe says:-). Develop it. It is a good name.Ofcourse you won't get any money if you wanna sale.
    Last edited by catchnames; 2004-02-04 at 04:56 PM.
    Digital Intoxication-Live,Learn and Earn Online - Technology, Entrepreneurship and More.
    http://HI.FI.VC

  14. #44
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Left Coast
    Posts
    118
    . name. I think will soon Kick .com down the rungs of the cyberladder ..com has gotten fat, lazy,decadent, and stupid. name is shorter than .com and has much greater recognition among internet nerds. I mean "com" isn't even a dictionary word. .Name and .vc have my vote. .edu is OK too. Doesn't it have somethin to do with food?
    Last edited by http; 2004-04-18 at 02:46 PM.

  15. #45
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    232
    .name as an extension is worthless. The reason other extensions have value is because companies buy them - why on earth would a company buy a .name especially when they have so many better alternatives?

    .name is known and marketed as being for individuals - registering other .names is certain to end up being a waste of money.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  

Sponsors

Trellian Direct Search Network
Domain Escrow Services
Above.com Domain Registrar, Marketplace and Revenue Optimizer

Industry Events

11-14 August 2019
Affiliate Summit East
New York, NY

4-6 March 2019
LeadsCon
Las Vegas

15-18 September 2018
MERGE 2018
Orlando, FL

Poll

How do you invest in domains?
to see the Poll results!
DomainState.com
Domain Tools | Domain Directory | Registrar Stats | Domain Glossary | Industry Events | FAQ | Members | Terms | RSS | Link To Us | Advertise | Contact Us
Other Related Trellian Services:
Above.com Registrar  |  Above.com Marketplace  |  Above.com Domain Manager  |  Free Search Toolbar  |  Free Webpage Builder  |  Keyword Research
Direct Search Navigation  |  Search Engine Submission and SEO Tools
Copyright © 2002 DomainState.com a Trellian Company 2014 Bronze Sponsor - Internet Commerce Association