+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    England
    Posts
    2,141

    WIPO Proposal to Allow “Paperless” UDRP


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    3,054
    I submitted a couple of comments:

    http://forum.icann.org/lists/eudrp/msg00001.html
    http://forum.icann.org/lists/eudrp/msg00003.html

    NAF's comment included an interesting tidbit:

    http://forum.icann.org/lists/eudrp/msg00000.html

    The UDRP requires a "formalities" or "deficiency" check before a Complaint can be accepted by the Provider and served on the Respondent (UDRP Rule 4). In over 90% of cases (anectodally), the Complaint has at least one "deficiency" that needs to be corrected. (from bottom of page 1 of the PDF)
    90% is a shocking statistic, given that complainants have unlimited time to prepare their complaints. This highlights the lack of fairness and lack of due process in the short time period for domain name registrants to respond to UDRP complaints (and potentially to URS complaints).
    George Kirikos - (416) 588-0269

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  

Diamond Sponsor

Platinum Sponsors

URL Trends Domain Valuation Reports
Above Domain Parking Manager
Addme.com SEO Tools


 
DomainState.com
Advertise   |   Contact Us   |   Domain Glossary   |   Domain Links   |   Domain Tools   |   FAQ   |   Members   |   Terms
Other Related Trellian Services:
Above Domain Parking Manager   |   Free Search Toolbar   |   Free Webpage Builder   |   Keyword Research   |   Search Engine Submission   |   SEO Tools
Copyright © 2002 - 2010 DomainState.com a Trellian Company