+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2
1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 30
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    31

    .CO extension ... will it be big or flop?

    Comments anyone on if you think the .CO extension will be number #2 behind .COM in a couple years? Or do you think it will flop and be useless like a .Biz or a .Ws

    thanks for your thoughts.
    B

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    .com.au
    Posts
    11,053

    Re: .CO extension ... will it be big or flop?

    Originally posted by stateofwash
    Comments anyone on if you think the .CO extension will be number #2 behind .COM in a couple years?
    Umm...no.

    It sounds like an extension for typos only.
    GamesRoom.com, Possum.com, Arithmetic.com on greatdomains auction, low reserves, priced to sell!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    10,988
    .cm part deux.

    most of the typos with traffic are Huge Marks.

    Sadly they are selling the potential of it as if the World will instantly recognize .co as COmpany or COrporation
    "

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    31
    ok, so you're advice is probably not to spend $500 on the landrush time frame for something like HOUSES.CO ?

    i value your advice as i know very little about all this.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    .com.au
    Posts
    11,053
    Originally posted by stateofwash
    ok, so you're advice is probably not to spend $500 on the landrush time frame for something like HOUSES.CO ?

    i value your advice as i know very little about all this.
    Run as fast as you can from this stuff. Traffic is the only reason for buying a name like that.
    GamesRoom.com, Possum.com, Arithmetic.com on greatdomains auction, low reserves, priced to sell!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    300
    Two or three years ago it would have had great prospects. But the domain market in 2010 is very different and this extension could cause a lot of legal problems with trademarks. The only thing going for it now is traffic leakage.

    Regards...jmcc
    www.hosterstats.com
    Domain Registration Stats and Historical DNS Database.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    300
    Originally posted by Domo Sapiens
    Sadly they are selling the potential of it as if the World will instantly recognize .co as COmpany or COrporation
    Like .biz and then .bz were supposed to be about business?

    Regards...jmcc
    www.hosterstats.com
    Domain Registration Stats and Historical DNS Database.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    10,988
    Originally posted by snoopy
    Run as fast as you can from this stuff. Traffic is the only reason for buying a name like that.
    exactly
    houses.co Alexa 0 / No rank

    amazon.co Alexa Traffic Rank: 521,958 Traffic Rank in US: 175,572
    Not worth the risk , even that somebody most likely bid for it.
    "

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    31
    Dang, and I was just about ready to plop down some big money to try and get a couple of these.

    So you're SURE something like food.co would not be worth spending $500 on for a 1 year registration?

    To the best of your well trained domain name knowledge ... you're sure?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    31
    or something like STRING.CO ? I should run from that or pay the $500?
    CEOF.NET
    CEOOP.COM
    CREWT.COM
    HOTNV.COM
    JEFCO.NET
    MAMOUL.COM
    MRDAYS.COM
    OSAV.NET
    RITAT.COM
    RITAV.COM
    ROCELLE.COM
    ROCKLA.COM
    VHCO.NET
    VLOADS.COM
    EFTY.ORG

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Behind your curtains
    Posts
    4,788
    why would string.co be worth $500 undeveloped?
    Earlier you stated that you know very little about this but then you say you were prepared to 'plop down big money'. I would *really* recommend reading through the forum and understanding the hype surrounding new extensions (and how they've all failed even after the hype) before wasting your money. It seems you may have already made your mind up but the people in this thread who have told you they are worthless have been in this industry a lot of years successfully - you would do well to heed their caution.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    31
    Rob,

    I really appreciate your thoughts and advice. Really I do value your advice and the advice of the two other replies.

    "recommend reading through the forum and understanding the hype surrounding new extensions (and how they've all failed even after the hype"

    Can I ask a question about your statement above? Has every "new extension" that has ever come out failed?

    At one time .NET and .ORG were new extensions right?

    Now I understand .ws - .biz - .info - .us all are quite worthless, but this .CO being so close to the extension of .COM ... do you think there is an inkling of a chance they might catch on and surpass at least .ORG in a couple years?

    Thanks.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    31
    here's one last straight up question if you would please humor me. as far as your knowledge of domain name and with your best guess, do you really think that if I paid a lot of money for JEWELRY.CO .... can you say without any doubt that it would be worthless undeveloped?
    CEOF.NET
    CEOOP.COM
    CREWT.COM
    HOTNV.COM
    JEFCO.NET
    MAMOUL.COM
    MRDAYS.COM
    OSAV.NET
    RITAT.COM
    RITAV.COM
    ROCELLE.COM
    ROCKLA.COM
    VHCO.NET
    VLOADS.COM
    EFTY.ORG

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Behind your curtains
    Posts
    4,788
    yes - it has taken years for .net and .org to reach a fraction of the value of .coms. Since those we've had umpteen new extensions - none of which have commanded high prices for premium terms even at a few dollars reg fee. Any value in new launches has been due to 'pump and dump' hype - .mobi is a good example of this. It's ok if you can be the one selling the donkey but you really don't want to be lumbered with feeding it. Your money would be better spent on existing opportunities with proven track records.
    However if you have a business plan to buy, for example, jewelry.co (note different spellings between US and Europe) then of course you can *create* value. However you are always going to lose traffic to the .com if you establish your site.
    On another note landrushes are usually flawed anyway - chances are you won't even get a sniff at anything premium even though your money will be tied up with registrars forever.
    Last edited by Rob; 03-24-2010 at 07:05 PM.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    5,094
    StateofWash if you can get keyword domains like Jewlery.com ..

    Absolutely register them... I see 101 has 2 year registrations for $117..

    You do understand that the owners of .com.co have first rights to the .co ?

    Rob was correct though..you wont even get a sniff at the premium domains.. but if you do..I'd grab it

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  

Sponsors

DomainState.com
Advertise   |   Contact Us   |   Domain Glossary   |   Domain Links   |   Domain Tools   |   FAQ   |   Members   |   Terms   |   RSS   |   Link To Us
Other Related Trellian Services:
Above Domain Parking Manager   |   Free Search Toolbar   |   Free Webpage Builder   |   Keyword Research   |   Search Engine Submission   |   SEO Tools
Copyright © 2002 - 2011 DomainState.com a Trellian Company